Despite what has been published in the press and disclosed by the CRA and the Ministry of Revenue Quebec (MRQ), the use of zappers has not reached epidemic proportions in the restaurant industry. Zappers have been around since the mid-1990s, though most of the usage seems to have been confined to Quebec. In fact, the vast majority of the convictions for sales tax evasion have occurred in Quebec. For background on the use and abuse of zappers, please read this, this, and this. The unfortunate thing about all of this attention is that it may draw our attention away from a far larger threat to our operations. The indirect audit approach.
Posts Tagged ‘PST’
Posted in Canada Revenue Agency, GST, HST, Income taxes, Ministry of Revenue, PST, Sales Tax, Taxes, tagged Audits, CRA, GST, HST, Income tax, Ministry of Revenue, POS, PST, RST, Sales Tax, tax evasion, zappers on February 7, 2010| Leave a Comment »
Posted in Canada Revenue Agency, GST, HST, Income taxes, Ministry of Revenue, PST, Sales Tax, Taxes, tagged Audits, CRA, GST, POS, PST, RST, Sales Tax, tax evasion, zappers on November 14, 2009| 7 Comments »
This post concerns the use of zappers in restaurant operations. It is not a “how to” guide in their “proper” use, nor is it, in any way, an endorsement of their use. In fact, if you are even thinking of employing a zapper to fill your pockets with cash stop and read this post. It is not worth the risk. You will get caught, eventually, and here’s why.
Posted in Canada Revenue Agency, GST, HST, Income taxes, Ministry of Revenue, PST, Sales Tax, Taxes, tagged Audits, CRA, fraud, Income tax, POS, PST, Revenu Quebec, RST, Sales Tax, tax evasion, zappers on November 14, 2009| 2 Comments »
Recently, we’ve begun to hear a lot more about tax evasion in the restaurant industry. More specifically, we’re talking about technologically-assisted tax fraud, using zappers or phantom-ware. It made the news, again this past week, when it was disclosed that the Canada Revenue Agency had found more than $40M of unreported tax in the restaurant industry attributed to the use of zappers. Today’s post looks at the issue of tax fraud in the restaurant industry and tries to determine how “rampant” it might be.
While tax fraud can occur in many different ways, when we talk about the restaurant industry, it usually takes the form of cash sales “skimmed” off and not reported for tax purposes.
I don’t want to scare you, but I feel it is my duty as a fellow restaurateur and as an accountant. After reading this headline, many of you will think this blog entry is going to be about the economy and how it will affect your restaurant business. As for the economy, I think the worst is behind us, but there is another threat to your business that is going to be a lot worse in the next few years. Let me explain…
Posted in Canada Revenue Agency, GST, HST, Income taxes, Ministry of Revenue, PST, Sales Tax, Taxes, tagged allowances, Audits, CRA, Customer comps, GST, Income tax, Liquor, over-pouring, PST, RST, Sales Mix, Sales Tax on November 6, 2009| 1 Comment »
So far, I’ve discussed the POS system and how to maintain it for accurate reporting, how to document your sales mix for all audit periods, and the importance of maintaining an accurate history of your menu prices. Taken together, these bookkeeping tasks are crucial in helping the restaurateur determine, and properly support, accurate weighted average prices. This is a crucial component of the mark-up calculation performed during a typical audit.
Now we’ll take a look at the actual cost of the alcoholic beverages purchased for sale.
Posted in Canada Revenue Agency, GST, HST, Income taxes, Ministry of Revenue, PST, Sales Tax, Taxes, tagged Audits, CRA, GST, Liquor, POS, PST, Sales Mix, Sales Tax on November 5, 2009| Leave a Comment »
This is the second post in the series on auditproofing your restaurant from an unfair audit. Most restaurants and bars with weak internal controls (almost all independent establishments), will be audited by the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) or a provincial tax authority using an indirect audit approach. In most cases, this approach will be the mark-up method, which seeks to project the sales level that was likely to have been generated based on the amount of alcoholic beverages purchased by the establishment. As we have seen in other posts, this audit method involves making a number of assumptions about the operation. Determining what these assumptions should be, can be quite complicated.